|
|
Please answer the following
|
|
Were you allowed inside the court room during any of the rulings or proceedings? |
|
|
|
If so, please state which |
|
|
|
Were you allowed to cross-examine the
accuser? |
|
|
|
Were you sequestrated because of these
rulings? |
|
|
|
If so, please state when |
|
|
|
What belongings did you lose because of
the rule e.g. house, car? |
|
|
|
What is the monetary value of the
belongings you lost? |
|
|
|
Who were the accuser's lawyers? |
|
|
|
Who were your lawyers? |
|
|
|
Did your lawyers inform you that you would
not be allowed inside the court room? |
|
|
|
Did your lawyers inform you that you may
not cross-examine the accuser ? |
|
|
|
Did your lawyers inform you that the
decision of the court is final ? |
|
|
|
Did your lawyers inform you that you may
not appeal against the rule 43 ruling ? |
|
|
|
Did your lawyers inform you stand the
chance of losing all your possessions if the court came out with a
verdict which is larger than your net salary ? |
|
|
|
Did your lawyers appeal and was it
successful? |
|
|
|
Describe how they did it? |
|
|
|
|
In the period since filing for divorce and
the Rule 43 application, did the accuser have access to any of your
financial instruments e.g. credit card, Pretorium Trust, Medical Fund
etc?
|
|
|
|
|
|
If so, what the accuser have in her
possession?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did the use of the above financial
instruments increased or decreased after filing for divorce?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you stop the use of the financial
instruments?
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you stopped it, why did you do that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were there any verbal agreements to
decrease the temporary amount allocated by the court?
|
|
|
|
|
|
If so, did the accuser and her lawyer
honor it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
If there was a verbal agreement, did you
honor it?
|
|
|
|
|
If you did not honor it, why not? |
|
|
|
Do you think your lawyers handled the case
well? |
|
|
| If you have any other comment,
please enter it here.
|
|
|
Buy my eBook "
Survive your divorce financially" for only R250